11:24 Now NATO members will literally bombed cybercriminals | |
| A team from NATO, led by Darth Vader Madeleine Albright (if someone does not know is a former U.S. secretary of state) believe that computer attacks on the vital resources of the North Atlantic Alliance should be equated with vooruzhnnomu attack. Kromet addition, according to their own opinion, this justifies Back military means. Experts say cyber attacks on power grids, command and control system of the alliance could lead to retaliatory measures of collective defense. The basis for the use of force would be Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty. She trakturet attack on one member of the alliance as an attack on all its members. Lawyers believe that the alliance should be put into the contract the individual items of cyber attacks is not as kibeneticheskie attacks are similar to military attack. In order to justify a retaliatory strike is quite descend Article 5. But as we all know, to establish who is responsible for cyber attacks and whether the actions are related kulhatskerov computer criminals with praviteltvami certain countries is problematic. In general, this whole mess brewing in Estonia. It was there during the crisis over the Bronze Soldier "in 2007, this country was faced with masirovannymi attacks and hacking its servers. After this, the Minister of Defence of Estonia Yayak Aaviksoo said that taken from outside attacks on the virtual space of the NATO member countries should be equated to a military incursion into the territory of these countries. Recently, the authorities of Western countries have expressed growing concern about hacker attacks from the territory of China. The PRC government rejects the possibility of their involvement in these cyberattacks. Sources: 1) newspaper The Sandy Times 2) ITAR-TASS. | |
|
| |
| Total comments: 0 | |